Men's Rankings

[d3tennis]

Team
1.Washington University of St. Louis
2.Emory
3.Claremont-Mudd-Scripps
4.UC  Santa Cruz
5.Middlebury
6.Williams
7.Kenyon
8.Gustavus
9.Mary Washington
10.Bowdoin
11.Trinity (TX)
12.Redlands
13.Trinity (CT)
14.Carnegie Mellon
15.Amherst
16.The College of New Jersey
17.DePauw
18.Washington and Lee
19.Johns Hopkins
20.Whitman
21.UT-Tyler
22.Bates
23.Salisbury
24.Christopher Newport
25.University of Chicago
26.Denison
27.Cal Lutheran
28.Kalamazoo
29.Carleton
30.Pomona-Pitzer
30.Hardin-Simmons


Singles

1. Mike Greenberg, Kenyon
2. Filip Marinkovic, Middlebury
3. John Watts, Washington U
4. Andy Bryan, Gustavus
5. Stephen Sullivan, Bowdoin
6. Michael Goodwin, Emory
7. Michael Klimchak, TCNJ
8. Larry Wang, Claremont
9. David Maldow, Johns Hopkins
10. John Mook, Christopher Newport
11. Jared Kamel, UC Santa Cruz
12. Charlie Cutler, Washington U
13. Randy Loden, MWC
14. Spencer Feldman, Trintiy(CT)
15. Chris Fletcher, Methodist
16. John James, MWC
17. Dan Greenberg, Williams
18. Garrett Gates, Bowdoin
19. Zach Lerner, Amherst
20. Brendan Kincaid, Salisbury
21. Oliver Gaines, Trinity (TX)
22. Andrew Lee, Middlebury
23 T. John Kauss, Gustavus
23 T. Mark Boren, Emory
25. Max Ortiz, UC Santa Cruz
26. James Furr, Trinity (TX)
27. Eric Wagar, Redlands
28. Nick Lebedoff, Williams
29. Cameron Taylor, Pomona
30. John Pelton, Hope
31. Dustin Phillips, UT-Tyler
32. David Sutton, Greensboro
33. Ben Stein, Bates
34. Miguel Yunes, Carthage
35. Kortney Keith, Depauw
36. Robert Sajovich, UT-Tyler
37. Will Zhang, Chicago
38. Clifford Yook, Chapman
39. Michael Mintz, Amherst
40. Ryan Waters, Hardin Simmons
41. Arya Vayghan, St.Thomas
42. Will Moss, Hampden Sydney
43. Matt Liebman, Redlands
44. Colin Mark Griffin, UCSC
45. Michael Gurevich, NYU
46. Brett Ramsay, Trinity(CT)
47. Tim Ross, Washington and Lee
48. Colin Russell, Carleton
49. Matt Solomon, Whitman
50 T. David Tran, Trinity (TX)
50 T. Brian Pybas, UCSC


Doubles
1.Schils/Wang, Claremont-Mudd-Scripps
2.Bryan/Paukert, Gustavus Adolphus
3.Kamel/Vartabedian, UC Santa Cruz
4.Hoeland/Cutler, Washington University at St. Louis
5.Marinkovic/Thomson, Middlebury
6.Stein/Rupasinghe, Bates
7.Mosteller/Klimchak, The College of New Jersey
8.Loden/Murata, Mary Washington
9.Thatcher/Greenberg, Williams
10.Gaines/DeSantis, Trinity (TX)
11.Glidewell/Mook, Chrisopher Newport
12.Caplan/Goodwin, Emory
13.Greenberg/Polster, Kenyon
14.Gates/Caughron, Bowdoin
15.Phillips/Ashlock, UT-Tyler
16.Vasoontara/Blythe, Johns Hopkins
17.Burtzlaff/Kincaid, Salisbury
18.Lofgren/Newman, Denison
19.Pybas/Ortiz, UC Santa Cruz
20.Lopez/Lopez, Carthage
21.Lerner/Kim, Amherst
22.MacColl/Hough, Claremont-Mudd-Scripps
23.Lafontaine/Fox, Grinnell
24.Steigel/Kinkade, Haverford
25.Solomon/Solomon,Whitman

[d3tennis]

Team Rankings are pretty accurate - right now I think you have about the top 7 teams are all very close, from there about 8-22 are very close and then you have everyone else. Next Fall will be very exciting to see how much better everyone is and how the ITA regional results play out.

Singles/Doubles Ranking - First off I will say that doing the singles and doubles rankings are very difficult and is really are impossible tasks. The ranking committee does not just throw these things together, they spend several days/hours researching and try to come up with the most accurate rankings. The one thing that I noticed is that the national rankings do not follow the regional rankings at all. For instance you have John James from Mary Washington is ranked #2 in the ASouth above Maldow, Mook, Loden. However in the national ranking he is ranked #16 below all those guys. The same thing happened in West and Northeast. It seems like that should not happen. The regional committees know the players in there region better than the national committee. To me they should follow the regional rankings a little bit more when making national rankings. All in all I can't argue to much with what they have done, my rankings would look a little bit differently but I think everyones would be different.

I am curious to hear from some of you on the rankings....

[Swome]

I am sure the different penalties have nothing to do with the fact that Price may not be medically cleared to play this year but the team needs Williams in the lineup to compete for a title.

[Swome]

And that they did That was some great lax 

a fan wrote:a fan wrote:Amen, Paesan.  Im thrilled for Ketch, KMartin, pegleg, and the rest of the Statesmen out there.  Its exciting to see their boys play so well.

[tuhinkhangf]

Really its a good news.This site has lots of advantage. I found many interesting things from this Men's Rankings site. I like it very much. Its so interesting.I want to sharing this topic with some of my close friends. So thanks this post.




Mazda Millenia Parts

[planety55]

Do you happen to have a list of this years Men's rankings?  The list you have posted is outdated, and I don't know where else to get the list.  Be sure to include the D1-D3 rankings if you happen to know them.

[maha22]

federer remains on top after his victory over hewitt . nadal moves to number to 2 since murray lost in the round of 16 .tats bcause nadal defended his 720 points ( as of nw reaching the semis ) and murray had to defend 1200 ( last years final ) but couldnt .. if at al djoker wins us open .. he bcums no:3 ... and the fight for 3 and 4 is on .. wel roddick slips to no 6 and delporto gains no 5 ..
================
Life Cover | Life Insurance